From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753489Ab0BUXCz (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:02:55 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50077 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753308Ab0BUXCy (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:02:54 -0500 Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:03:11 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20100221.150311.193707249.davem@davemloft.net> To: lars.eggert@nokia.com Cc: zimmermann@nets.rwth-aachen.de, pavel@ucw.cz, apetlund@simula.no, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, Arnd.Hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@vyatta.com, william.allen.simpson@gmail.com, damian@tvk.rwth-aachen.de, ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/3] net: TCP thin-stream detection From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <2EC47E8B-BC4C-4DAB-86ED-F702D67F8AD0@nokia.com> References: <20100221102102.GB1311@ucw.cz> <2EC47E8B-BC4C-4DAB-86ED-F702D67F8AD0@nokia.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Lars Eggert Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:04:46 +0200 > Agree with Alexander. It is not at all clear to me that these > changes are safe for non-exerimental use in the wider Internet. It's off by default and we provide all sorts of experimental congestion control algorithms which can cause just as much if not more trouble than these thin-stream bits. There is no problem integrating these changes.