From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [PATCH] i915 / PM: Fix hibernate regression caused by suspend/resume splitting Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:32:36 -0800 Message-ID: <20100222083236.45bf150d__49843.6443544508$1266856554$gmane$org@jbarnes-piketon> References: <74fd948d1002171047g70d2bba0l957e264dfbc8ea23@mail.gmail.com> <201002172320.57491.rjw@sisk.pl> <74fd948d1002171629v7e86371cna4441e8feb27c326@mail.gmail.com> <201002182306.28052.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Pedro Ribeiro , pm list , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Anholt List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:47:53 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Jesse, Eric, what's the status of this patch? > > Should I take it directly (I'd really like an Ack) or is it queued up in > some tree waiting for me to pull? Or is there some reason not to have it, > despite it fixing things for some people? Hm, I thought Eric had applied that to his for-linus branch, but it looks like that branch is empty now. Maybe Rafael posted an update that Eric missed and so you just have a partial fix in your tree? -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center