From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754075Ab0BWUVF (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:21:05 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11730 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751945Ab0BWUVD (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:21:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Stephen Rothwell X-Fcc: ~/Mail/linus Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, hjl.tools@gmail.com, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Kyle McMartin Subject: Re: linux-next requirements (Was: Re: [tip:x86/ptrace] ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET) In-Reply-To: Stephen Rothwell's message of Tuesday, 23 February 2010 10:59:59 +1100 <20100223105959.a50dbe11.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20100211195614.886724710@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com> <20100222090710.GA31357@elte.hu> <20100222203319.8bd497a2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100222102745.GJ20844@elte.hu> <20100222224752.0cbd5807.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4B830BD8.3090600@zytor.com> <20100223105959.a50dbe11.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> X-Zippy-Says: Is this BOISE?? Message-Id: <20100223202030.44DED64C@magilla.sf.frob.com> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:20:30 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Are there any downsides to Roland's patch as far as PARISC is concerned > (apart from the loss of some functionality, of course)? Kyle ACK'd my parisc patch, and my impression is he wants it to go in and does not plan to work on the necessary arch support imminently. I think the only visible effect of turning off HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK on parisc will be that /proc/pid/syscall is not available. Thanks, Roland