From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754701Ab0BWWyw (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:54:52 -0500 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:51178 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753249Ab0BWWyu (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:54:50 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:54:43 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Roland McGrath , Ingo Molnar , mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, hjl.tools@gmail.com, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Kyle McMartin Subject: Re: linux-next requirements (Was: Re: [tip:x86/ptrace] ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET) Message-Id: <20100224095443.cb398c27.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <4B843F66.6030000@zytor.com> References: <20100211195614.886724710@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com> <20100222090710.GA31357@elte.hu> <20100222203319.8bd497a2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100222102745.GJ20844@elte.hu> <20100222224752.0cbd5807.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4B830BD8.3090600@zytor.com> <20100223105959.a50dbe11.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100223202030.44DED64C@magilla.sf.frob.com> <4B843F66.6030000@zytor.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.0 (GTK+ 2.18.7; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__24_Feb_2010_09_54_43_+1100_TlpEJHGffexr1Ph1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Wed__24_Feb_2010_09_54_43_+1100_TlpEJHGffexr1Ph1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:49:42 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > > On 02/23/2010 12:20 PM, Roland McGrath wrote: > >> Are there any downsides to Roland's patch as far as PARISC is concerned > >> (apart from the loss of some functionality, of course)? > >=20 > > Kyle ACK'd my parisc patch, and my impression is he wants it to go in > > and does not plan to work on the necessary arch support imminently. > >=20 > > I think the only visible effect of turning off HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK > > on parisc will be that /proc/pid/syscall is not available. >=20 > Added to tip:x86/ptrace. And Linus actually put it in his tree yesterday ... commit 15cbf627abcd93c3c668d5a92d58d9fec8f953dd "Revert "parisc: HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK"" --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Wed__24_Feb_2010_09_54_43_+1100_TlpEJHGffexr1Ph1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuEXLMACgkQjjKRsyhoI8wb3ACgohZdrhbZ+u+VHt7udSSZx15e Nv8Anjm1uBoN+5bclL7q/FI6EJ/d9S+u =3rcX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__24_Feb_2010_09_54_43_+1100_TlpEJHGffexr1Ph1--