From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing control. Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:07:43 -0800 Message-ID: <20100303000743.GA13744__43315.7002823011$1267574622$gmane$org@us.ibm.com> References: <4B88E431.6040609@parallels.com> <4B894564.7080104@parallels.com> <4B89727C.9040602@parallels.com> <4B8AE8C1.1030305@free.fr> <4B8D28CF.8060304@parallels.com> <20100302211942.GA17816@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Pavel Emelyanov , Linux Netdev List , containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Netfilter Development Mailinglist , Ben Greear List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Eric W. Biederman [ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org] wrote: | | I think replacing a struct pid for another struct pid allocated in | descendant pid_namespace (but has all of the same struct upid values | as the first struct pid) is a disastrous idea. It destroys the True. Sorry, I did not mean we would need a new 'struct pid' for an existing process. I think we talked earlier of finding a way of attaching additional pid numbers to the same struct pid. Sukadev