On 15:55, John Hughes wrote:
> >That's the same patch you posted two weeks ago and on which Linus
> >commented he thinks it is broken. He also proposed another, simpler
> >patch (included below) which I'm running for a few days and which
> >fixes the sync problem for me.
> >  
> I've tried the "simpler patch" on my system and it makes no difference 
> for me.

Does it make no difference to Jens' patch, or no difference to an
unpatched kernel?

BTW, switching from cfq to noop or deadline also improved things a
bit for me.

Thanks
Andre
-- 
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe