From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754041Ab0CGBNn (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:13:43 -0500 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:33978 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752950Ab0CGBNm (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:13:42 -0500 Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:13:35 -0500 From: tytso@mit.edu To: Dave Airlie Cc: David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] X doesn't work with 2.6.33 (can't find any input devices) Message-ID: <20100307011335.GA5149@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: tytso@mit.edu, Dave Airlie , David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20100303151720.GA3191@thunk.org> <20100303.072007.170106625.davem@davemloft.net> <20100305044054.GB5747@thunk.org> <21d7e9971003042111n5b5145c5sd9b62b53522cfd86@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21d7e9971003042111n5b5145c5sd9b62b53522cfd86@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 03:11:53PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:40 PM, wrote: > > See Linus's complaints over the nouveau driver; it's the same > > principle; something is really broken. > > Not really, this is just somebody doing something stupid one would hope, > > does lshal on both kernels give similiar results? No, it's quite different. See attached. --- lshal-2.6.33 2010-03-06 10:15:44.837265508 -0500 +++ lshal-2.6.32-git4 2010-03-06 18:45:35.782582002 -0500 @@ -1,17 +1,2446 @@ -Dumping 23 device(s) from the Global Device List: +Dumping 149 device(s) from the Global Device List: ------------------------------------------------- ... It looks like it's fixed as of 2.6.33-git10. Hopefully whoever fixed it will backport it to 2.6.33-STABLE, since this will seriously screw up anyone wanting to use 2.6.33 at least on Ubuntu; I don't know about other distributions. - Ted