From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86 emulator mark VMMCALL and LMSW as privileged Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 10:46:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20100307084648.GO16909@redhat.com> References: <20100303155305.GF16909@redhat.com> <4B9367BB.8030600@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47215 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752370Ab0CGIqv (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Mar 2010 03:46:51 -0500 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o278ko5k026509 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2010 03:46:51 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B9367BB.8030600@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 10:45:47AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 03/03/2010 05:53 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >LMSW is present in both group tables. It was marked privileged only in > >one of them. Intel analog of VMMCALL is already marked privileged. > > > > Both VMCALL and VMMCALL are unprivileged. > But _we_ do not allow them in CPL!=0. -- Gleb.