From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753738Ab0CUVzI (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:55:08 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:45835 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753534Ab0CUVzF (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:55:05 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:54:55 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Avi Kivity Cc: Pekka Enberg , Anthony Liguori , "Zhang, Yanmin" , Peter Zijlstra , Sheng Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti , oerg Roedel , Jes Sorensen , Gleb Natapov , Zachary Amsden , ziteng.huang@intel.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Fr?d?ric Weisbecker Subject: Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single project Message-ID: <20100321215455.GB13219@elte.hu> References: <20100318170223.GB9756@elte.hu> <4BA25E66.2050800@redhat.com> <20100318172805.GB26067@elte.hu> <4BA32E1A.2060703@redhat.com> <20100319085346.GG12576@elte.hu> <4BA47AD0.2010509@redhat.com> <20100321190656.GC25922@elte.hu> <4BA68009.5010906@redhat.com> <20100321205531.GC30194@elte.hu> <4BA692C3.7010408@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BA692C3.7010408@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Avi Kivity wrote: > On 03/21/2010 10:55 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > >Of course you could say the following: > > > > ' Thanks, I'll mark this for v2.6.36 integration. Note that we are not > > able to add this to the v2.6.35 kernel queue anymore as the ongoing > > usability work already takes up all of the project's maintainer and > > testing bandwidth. If you want the feature to be merged sooner than that > > then please help us cut down on the TODO and BUGS list that can be found > > at XYZ. There's quite a few low hanging fruits there. ' > > That would be shooting at my own foot as well as the contributor's since I > badly want that RCU stuff, and while a GUI would be nice, that itch isn't on > my back. I think this sums up the root cause of all the problems i see with KVM pretty well. Thanks, Ingo