From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] Registering sgx device and it's platform data Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:49:02 +0300 Message-ID: <20100330094902.GG30597@nokia.com> References: <19F8576C6E063C45BE387C64729E7394044DEBF372@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Reply-To: felipe.balbi@nokia.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233]:36711 "EHLO mgw-mx06.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756077Ab0C3Jtp (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:49:45 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: ext Paul Walmsley Cc: "Agarwal, Preshit" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "Pais, Allen" , "Balbi Felipe (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" Hi, On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:49:19AM +0200, ext Paul Walmsley wrote: >I would suggest that you name this function be named something more >specific, such as omap_sgx_set_bus_tput(), since the SGX driver may also >need to set other PM constraints later, such as wakeup latency >constraints. then it could just add the contraints to the same function instead of passing another pointer to driver ?? -- balbi