From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754325Ab0CaPIR (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:08:17 -0400 Received: from s15228384.onlinehome-server.info ([87.106.30.177]:36521 "EHLO mail.x86-64.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752653Ab0CaPIP (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:08:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:08:54 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Andrew Morton , davej@redhat.com, trenn@suse.de, linux@dominikbrodowski.net, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [-v2 PATCH 2/6] powernow-k8: Add core performance boost support Message-ID: <20100331150854.GC30028@aftab> References: <1269610800-23847-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> <1269610800-23847-3-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> <20100330154229.dc8ebd24.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100331061343.GA28659@aftab> <20100330232221.826fe933.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100331063546.GB28659@aftab> <20100330233851.17370621.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4BB2EEE1.4010904@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BB2EEE1.4010904@zytor.com> Organization: Advanced Micro Devices =?iso-8859-1?Q?GmbH?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=2C_Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str=2E_34=2C_85609_Dornach_bei_M=FC?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?nchen=2C_Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer=3A_Thomas_M=2E_McCoy=2C_Giuli?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?ano_Meroni=2C_Andrew_Bowd=2C_Sitz=3A_Dornach=2C_Gemeinde_A?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?schheim=2C_Landkreis_M=FCnchen=2C_Registergericht_M=FCnche?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?n=2C?= HRB Nr. 43632 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Date: Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:42:41PM -0700 > On 03/30/2010 08:38 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > I've unilaterally decided that all six patches should be merged via the > > x86 tree, btw. They could be split between x86 and cpufreq, but I > > suspect there are interdependencies which would make that hard. > > > > I would agree with that. I'll try to get them in tomorrow. Cool. I'll have updated versions of the patches soon - just don't take those yet. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. -- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Operating Systems Research Center