From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nzpiq-00079k-Mx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:16:32 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37067 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nzpip-00078Z-4X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:16:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nzpih-0002eK-6q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:16:31 -0400 Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([88.191.82.174]:43199) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nzpig-0002e4-60 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:16:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:36:21 +0200 From: Aurelien Jarno Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] tcg-hppa finish, v4 Message-ID: <20100408093621.GA5700@volta.aurel32.net> References: <4BBC7304.7020508@aurel32.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 04:29:11PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 04/07/2010 04:56 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Sorry, I haven't find time to review it in details. Would also be nice > > if someone can try it on an hppa machine, and ack it. > > I got an ack against v3 here: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-03/msg01214.html > > This isn't just written to a spec, I do have access to an hppa machine: > > rth@dingo:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo > processor : 0 > cpu family : PA-RISC 2.0 > cpu : PA8600 (PCX-W+) > cpu MHz : 552.000000 > model : 9000/785/J6000 > model name : Duet W+ > hversion : 0x00005d40 > sversion : 0x00000491 > I-cache : 512 KB > D-cache : 1024 KB (WB, direct mapped) > ITLB entries : 160 > DTLB entries : 160 - shared with ITLB > bogomips : 1101.00 > software id : 2011956991 > > Test results for linux-user-test-0.3: > > ok: i386 arm armeb sparc ppc mips mipsel > bad: sparc32plus ppc64abi32 sh4 sh4eb x86_64 > > Of course, sparc32plus doesn't work on an i386 host either -- I think > the implementation of fstat is wrong. > > I don't have any system emulations set up on the hppa machine yet. > It might be really interesting to also test qemu-system, as it usually catches a lot more bugs. This is especially given that your patch changes system emulation only parts. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net