All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: avoid direct write if we fall back to buffered
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:58:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100414015819.GE5530@mail.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201004081547.24593.lidongyang@novell.com>

On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 03:47:24PM +0800, Li Dongyang wrote:
> when we fall back to buffered write from direct write, we call
> __generic_file_aio_write but that will end up doing direct write
> even we are only prepared to do buffered write because the file
> has O_DIRECT flag set. This is a fix for
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591039

	We need to evaluate what __g_f_a_w() is doing and make sure
we're matching it appropriately for ocfs2.

> +	ret = file_remove_suid(file);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_dio;

	NAK.  We do suid checks in ocfs2_prepare_inode_for_write().
Calling file_remove_suid() is outside of ocfs2's locking.  It calls
->setattr() which has its own rules in ocfs2.

> +	file_update_time(file);

	We have special behaviors regarding time updates for ocfs2
direct I/O.  This might want to live right next to the call to
generic_file_buffered_write().  But maybe not.  It needs to be checked.

Joel

-- 

To spot the expert, pick the one who predicts the job will take the
longest and cost the most.

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-14  1:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-08  7:47 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: avoid direct write if we fall back to buffered Li Dongyang
2010-04-08 18:41 ` Sunil Mushran
2010-04-09  2:27   ` Li Dongyang
2010-04-09  2:38     ` Tao Ma
2010-04-09  3:00       ` Li Dongyang
2010-04-09  3:32         ` Tao Ma
2010-04-09  9:20           ` Li Dongyang
2010-04-09 17:36             ` Sunil Mushran
2010-04-09  7:58   ` Coly Li
2010-04-09  7:56     ` Tao Ma
2010-04-14  1:58 ` Joel Becker [this message]
2010-04-14  7:42   ` Li Dongyang
2010-04-10  7:37 Dong Yang Li
2010-04-10  9:37 ` Joel Becker
2010-04-10  9:48   ` Li Dongyang
2010-04-12  5:16 ` Tao Ma
2010-04-12  5:31   ` Li Dongyang
2010-04-12  6:24     ` Tao Ma
2010-04-14  2:44       ` Tao Ma
2010-04-14  5:47         ` Li Dongyang
2010-04-14  6:08           ` Tao Ma
2010-04-13 23:54   ` Joel Becker
2010-04-14  0:13     ` Tao Ma
2010-04-14  5:58     ` Li Dongyang
2010-04-14 19:20       ` Joel Becker
2010-04-22 14:13         ` Li Dongyang
2010-04-23 20:06           ` Joel Becker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100414015819.GE5530@mail.oracle.com \
    --to=joel.becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.