From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bgamari.foss@gmail.com Subject: (no subject) Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:00:56 -0700 Message-ID: <201004210200.o3L20uTU016700@smtp1.linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org >>From nobody Tue Apr 20 22:00:38 2010 From: Ben Gamari To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pm list Subject: Re: [REGRESSION 2.6.34] Suspend fails in pm_test=processor on Dell laptop In-Reply-To: <201004200533.13219.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <4bcb1cf2.116bdc0a.2008.6f5a@mx.google.com> <201004200533.13219.rjw@sisk.pl> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:11:52 -0400 Message-ID: <87633mey6f.fsf@ben-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:33:13 +0200, "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > On Sunday 18 April 2010, Ben Gamari wrote: [snip] > > It seems that something in the 2.6.34 merge cycle has broken suspend to RAM on > > my Dell Latitude D830. While suspend has been rock solid for several release > > cycles, as of 2.6.34-rc4 it locks up on suspend. All of the pm_test options up > > to processor work fine, precluding a driver issue. > > Hmm, does the "processors" work? Nope. Processors is the first failing phase. I'm still working on getting a bisection, but it'll be a few more days due to various school-related delays. - Ben