All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] BKL conversion in tty layer
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 20:30:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201005172030.23741.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100517153055.GA28137@suse.de>

On Monday 17 May 2010, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> I'd prefer to do this for .36, not for .35.  Arnd, I'll be glad to queue
> these patches up to the tty development tree after .35-rc1 is out, so it
> gets lots of testing in the linux-next tree, is that ok?  If so, can you
> resend them to me at that time?

Ok, I'll make sure it still works with .35-rc1 when it's out and add
Alan's ACK, then send a you a pull request. Did you already merge the
series from Alan that this is based on, or do you want those patches
to wait as well? They are in my git tree, so they will be included
in my pull request if they are not in -rc1.

Also, it would be nice if you could merge the first patch of my
series, which should be completely harmless (it just renames
function calls) but having it upstream means that we can
keep the remaining patches that are required for BKL-less
kernels a lot smaller.

	Arnd


  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-17 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-15 20:59 [PATCH v3 00/10] BKL conversion in tty layer Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-15 20:59 ` [PATCH 01/10] tty: replace BKL with a new tty_lock Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-15 20:59 ` [PATCH 02/10] tty: never hold BTM while getting tty_mutex Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-15 20:59 ` [PATCH 03/10] tty: fix console_sem lock order Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-15 20:59 ` [PATCH 04/10] cdc-acm: remove dead code Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-15 20:59 ` [PATCH 05/10] tty: introduce wait_event_interruptible_tty Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-15 20:59 ` [PATCH 06/10] tty: annotate tty_write_lock Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-15 20:59 ` [PATCH 07/10] tty: reorder ldisc locking Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-15 20:59 ` [PATCH 08/10] tty: untangle locking of wait_until_sent Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-16  3:12   ` Daniel K.
2010-05-15 20:59 ` [PATCH 09/10] tty: remove tty_lock_nested Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-15 20:59 ` [PATCH 10/10] tty: implement BTM as mutex instead of BKL Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-16  3:33   ` Daniel K.
2010-05-16 12:58     ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-17 13:41 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] BKL conversion in tty layer Alan Cox
2010-05-17 15:30   ` Greg KH
2010-05-17 18:30     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2010-05-18  4:27       ` Greg KH
2010-05-18 21:52         ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-19  1:50           ` Greg KH
2010-05-22 13:54             ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-17 18:49   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-06-17 19:13   ` Tony Luck
2010-06-17 19:40     ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-06-17 20:15       ` Tony Luck
2010-06-17 21:48         ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-06-17 22:09           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-18 12:58             ` [PATCH] tty: avoid recursive BTM in pty_close Arnd Bergmann
2010-06-18 16:21               ` Alan Cox
2010-06-18 16:52                 ` Tony Luck
2010-06-18 18:35                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-06-18 20:25                     ` Tony Luck
2010-06-19 12:32                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-06-19 20:29                         ` [PATCH] serial: revert "Use block_til_ready helper" Arnd Bergmann
2010-06-19 21:57                           ` Alan Cox
2010-06-20 20:54                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-06-21 14:13                               ` Alan Cox
2010-06-21 20:57                                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-06-21 20:58                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-06-21 17:11                           ` Tony Luck
2010-06-22 23:01                           ` Greg KH
2010-06-28 17:17                     ` [PATCH] tty: avoid recursive BTM in pty_close Tony Luck
2010-06-28 19:03                       ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201005172030.23741.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.