From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755247Ab0ERE1P (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2010 00:27:15 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:57112 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754261Ab0ERE1O (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2010 00:27:14 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 21:27:52 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , John Kacur , Al Viro , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] BKL conversion in tty layer Message-ID: <20100518042752.GA20470@suse.de> References: <1273957196-13768-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20100517144130.1d8aa313@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100517153055.GA28137@suse.de> <201005172030.23741.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201005172030.23741.arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 08:30:23PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 17 May 2010, Greg KH wrote: > > > > I'd prefer to do this for .36, not for .35. Arnd, I'll be glad to queue > > these patches up to the tty development tree after .35-rc1 is out, so it > > gets lots of testing in the linux-next tree, is that ok? If so, can you > > resend them to me at that time? > > Ok, I'll make sure it still works with .35-rc1 when it's out and add > Alan's ACK, then send a you a pull request. Did you already merge the > series from Alan that this is based on, or do you want those patches > to wait as well? They are in my git tree, so they will be included > in my pull request if they are not in -rc1. No, I do not have his patches anywhere, as I didn't expect that they were being sent to me to apply :) > Also, it would be nice if you could merge the first patch of my > series, which should be completely harmless (it just renames > function calls) but having it upstream means that we can > keep the remaining patches that are required for BKL-less > kernels a lot smaller. Can you resend this patch to me so that I can include it? thanks, greg k-h