From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752746Ab0ETSy1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 14:54:27 -0400 Received: from ns1.siteground211.com ([209.62.36.12]:43960 "EHLO serv01.siteground211.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752601Ab0ETSyW (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 14:54:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 21:55:05 +0300 From: Felipe Balbi To: Andrew Morton Cc: felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Tony Lindgren , David Brownell , Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] teach gpiolib about gpio debouncing Message-ID: <20100520185504.GC25089@gandalf> Reply-To: me@felipebalbi.com References: <1274090554-19420-1-git-send-email-felipe.balbi@nokia.com> <20100520110431.58c42ee8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100520110431.58c42ee8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - serv01.siteground211.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - felipebalbi.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:04:31AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2010 13:02:29 +0300 > felipe.balbi@nokia.com wrote: > > > From: Felipe Balbi > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm resending this series since no-one has had any further > > comments for quite some time. > > > > Adding Andrew Morton to the loop also since David Brownell > > didn't pick the patch neither comment to any version of it. > > David's been very quiet lately - please always cc me on gpio patches. > > When were these first sent? Has there been any feedback or external > testing? > > I'm not seeing anything in the changelogs which helps me to understand > how important this feature is and it's rather late to be merging > 2.6.35 feature work.. I guess we could leave it to 2.6.36 since OMAP is currently the only user and we have our own omap-specific ways of setting debounce time on gpios. That would also give people more time to complain if they think the api should change somehow. -- balbi