From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C6BF6B0215 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 03:41:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.74]) by fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id o517fYLD016328 for (envelope-from kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:41:35 +0900 Received: from smail (m4 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C278E45DE6E for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:41:34 +0900 (JST) Received: from s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.94]) by m4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F81045DE60 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:41:34 +0900 (JST) Received: from s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D831DB8037 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:41:34 +0900 (JST) Received: from m108.s.css.fujitsu.com (m108.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.108]) by s4.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AE91DB8042 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:41:31 +0900 (JST) From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [patch -mm 15/18] oom: introduce find_lock_task_mm() to fix !mm false positives In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <20100601164114.2478.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:41:30 +0900 (JST) Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: David Rientjes Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel , Nick Piggin , Oleg Nesterov , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Balbir Singh , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > From: Oleg Nesterov > > Almost all ->mm == NUL checks in oom_kill.c are wrong. > > The current code assumes that the task without ->mm has already > released its memory and ignores the process. However this is not > necessarily true when this process is multithreaded, other live > sub-threads can use this ->mm. > > - Remove the "if (!p->mm)" check in select_bad_process(), it is > just wrong. > > - Add the new helper, find_lock_task_mm(), which finds the live > thread which uses the memory and takes task_lock() to pin ->mm > > - change oom_badness() to use this helper instead of just checking > ->mm != NULL. > > - As David pointed out, select_bad_process() must never choose the > task without ->mm, but no matter what oom_badness() returns the > task can be chosen if nothing else has been found yet. > > Change oom_badness() to return int, change it to return -1 if > find_lock_task_mm() fails, and change select_bad_process() to > check points >= 0. > > Note! This patch is not enough, we need more changes. > > - oom_badness() was fixed, but oom_kill_task() still ignores > the task without ->mm > > - oom_forkbomb_penalty() should use find_lock_task_mm() too, > and it also needs other changes to actually find the first > first-descendant children > > This will be addressed later. > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes need respin. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org