From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from hsp-52.hspserver.com ([85.197.80.179]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJSoa-0005VR-9n for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:52:29 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hsp-52.hspserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621A9A2C45C for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:47:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hsp-52.hspserver.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hsp-52.hspserver.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xS2aSQ0gCXpr for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:47:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tomboy.localnet (pD9E16B0A.dip.t-dialin.net [217.225.107.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hsp-52.hspserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF92FA2C44B for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:47:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Zimmermann To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:47:23 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.34-0.slh.5-sidux-amd64; KDE/4.4.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <4C04F6FD.4070804@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201006011647.23770.ml@vdm-design.de> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.197.80.179 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ml@vdm-design.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Is Angstrom dead? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:52:33 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am Dienstag 01 Juni 2010, 16:24:33 schrieb Robert P. J. Day: > On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Gary Thomas wrote: > > | libcanberra-gtk gudev-1.0) were not met: > > | No package 'gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10' found > > | > > | Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you > > | installed software in a non-standard prefix. > > | > > | Alternatively, you may set the environment variables CHEESE_CFLAGS > > | and CHEESE_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. > > | See the pkg-config man page for more details. > > > > NOTE: package cheese-2.30.1-r0: task do_configure: Failed > > now i'm slightly confused since neither ubuntu or fedora appear to > have any pkgconfig info for the cheese package, so why would there be > a test for it that you would need to override? or is this not > pkgconfig-related? It should never depend on the pkconfig files installed on your buildhost. Are you sure that the gstreamer package is build? > rday