All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Brandon Philips <brandon@ifup.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
	Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] module: fix bne2 "gave up waiting for init of module libcrc32c"
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:33:05 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201006021233.09140.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100602021029.GD10332@jenkins.ifup.org>

On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 11:40:29 am Brandon Philips wrote:
> On 16:51 Tue 01 Jun 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Brandon Philips wrote:
> > > When I tested a Kernel with Rusty's modules branch pulled onto
> > > 2.6.35-rc1 I got duplicate sysfs path errors:
> > Hmm. Yeah, the module_mutex used to be held across the whole "find -> add" 
> > state, but isn't any more.
> 
> Right.
> 
> > > To fix this we need to make sure that we only have one copy of a
> > > module going through load_module at a time.  Patch suggestion
> > > follows which boots without errors. I am sure there is a better
> > > way to do what it does ;)
> > 
> > I think Rusty may have made the lock a bit _too_ finegrained there,
> > and didn't add it to some places that needed it. It looks, for
> > example, like PATCH 1/2 actually drops the lock in places where it's
> > needed ("find_module()" is documented to need it, but now
> > load_module() didn't hold it at all when it did the find_module()).
> 
> Right, I noticed that too and held the lock in the patch I sent.
> 
> > Rather than adding a new "module_loading" list, I think we should be
> > able to just use the existing "modules" list, and just fix up the
> > locking a bit.
> >
> > In fact, maybe we could just move the "look up existing module" a
> > bit later - optimistically assuming that the module doesn't exist,
> > and then just undoing the work if it turns out that we were wrong,
> > just before adding ourselves to the list.
> >
> > A patch something like the appended (TOTALLY UNTESTED!)
> 
> FWIW, I tried this same idea initially and it breaks because the
> kobject EEXIST is coming from mod_sysfs_init() which happens further
> up in load_module() before the list_add_rcu().

I'll take a look.  Linus was right that my lock reduction was overzealous.

The kobject error should be harmless.

I have a simplified version of your problem (see testing patch); I'll
see what I can fix...

Thanks!
Rusty.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-02  3:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-25 21:00 [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-25 22:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-25 23:47   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-26  8:00     ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-26 11:57       ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-26 22:56         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-26 23:07           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-27  5:26           ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-27 18:46             ` Brandon Philips
2010-05-31  9:40               ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 12:00                 ` [PATCH 0/2] kernel/module.c locking changes Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 12:01                   ` [PATCH 1/2] module: make locking more fine-grained Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 12:02                     ` [PATCH 2/2] module: fix bne2 "gave up waiting for init of module libcrc32c" Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 16:48                       ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-31 18:19                         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-31 20:15                           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-31 20:16                             ` [PATCH 1/2] Make the module 'usage' lists be two-way Linus Torvalds
2010-05-31 20:17                               ` [PATCH 2/2] module: wait for other modules after dropping the module_mutex Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  1:37                               ` [PATCH 1/2] Make the module 'usage' lists be two-way Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  3:42                                 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  4:00                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  4:05                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  2:44                               ` Américo Wang
2010-06-01  3:51                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  1:57                             ` [PATCH 2/2] module: fix bne2 "gave up waiting for init of module libcrc32c" Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  3:40                               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  4:27                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  5:19                                 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  3:15                                   ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  1:21                           ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  3:24                             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  5:22                               ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01 14:58                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01 17:53                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01 23:24                                     ` Brandon Philips
2010-06-01 23:51                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  2:10                                         ` Brandon Philips
2010-06-02  3:03                                           ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2010-06-02  4:35                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  4:44                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  6:35                                               ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  7:45                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  8:12                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  9:07                                                     ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  5:52                                             ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  7:21                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02 14:06                                                 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02 14:50                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-03 13:06                                                     ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02 16:53                                                   ` Brandon Philips
2010-06-02 18:01                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-03  5:20                                                     ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-03 16:24                                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-04  1:02                                                         ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-04  1:55                                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-04  5:20                                                             ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-04 22:48                                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-05  1:49                                                                 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  3:09                                   ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  4:32                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  4:56                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02  5:52                                       ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02  6:59                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01  1:04                         ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01  5:38                     ` [PATCH 1/2] module: make locking more fine-grained Américo Wang
2010-06-01  5:55                       ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-27 21:57             ` [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-31  7:54               ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 10:23               ` [PATCH] module: fix reference to mod->percpu after freeing module Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 10:25                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-26 15:41       ` [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201006021233.09140.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brandon@ifup.org \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.