From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752841Ab0FGRv3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2010 13:51:29 -0400 Received: from jack.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de ([134.109.132.46]:47466 "EHLO jack.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751656Ab0FGRv2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2010 13:51:28 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 2315 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:51:27 EDT From: Alexander Stein To: Michal Marek Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig qconf: port to QT4 Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:12:53 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.32-gentoo-r7; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Roman Zippel , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, lkml References: <1275846668-17863-1-git-send-email-alexander.stein@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de> <4C0CE9FC.60905@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <4C0CE9FC.60905@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006071912.54313.alexander.stein@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de> X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: --- Start der SpamAssassin 3.3.0 Textanalyse (-0.9 Punkte) Fragen an/questions to: Postmaster TU Chemnitz * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.1 TVD_RCVD_IP TVD_RCVD_IP --- Ende der SpamAssassin Textanalyse X-Scan-Signature: 35a077d52d8eb09d911074c20d374ce4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Michal, Am Montag 07 Juni 2010, 14:45:48 schrieb Michal Marek: > I've only very little experience with Qt 3 or 4. The patch basically > changes most QSomeClass to Q3SomeClass, which is the Qt3-compatible > wrapper around QSomeClass. Now is it possible to still support Qt3? E.g. > have a header file that #defines Q3SomeClass back to QSomeClass and does > similar with the Qt headers, would that be possible? I know that Qt4 has > be there for five years already, but if the cost of keeping support for > old userspace is not too hight, I would try it. I never thought about qt3 compatibility but It seems to me that renaming the qt3 compat classes and revert the header file name changes should suffice to compile against qt3 again. But then somebody else has to do the makefile magic to support both versions. Also which version should be prefered if both are available? > BTW, after applying your patch, make xconfig starts ok, but clicking in > the main menu does nothing, and if I close the close button, it does not > exit, but stops reacting to any input (but it still handles window > resize). The qt3 version would display the "Save changes?" dialog here. I can click in the window around and closing the window using the X button asks me about saving the changes. Which QT version do you use actually? Best regards Alexander