From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755172Ab0FNGj6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 02:39:58 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:23218 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751428Ab0FNGjz (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 02:39:55 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=C/7Z5WykoQjeDOHBFRNv5gNx3/VxzLv+guubVcXm4u/FI9Eb5CX/EIhyWGrFKcke6n EvdlcOaiIZWP0y3f3vQmYLvri6O9qqzDgyyFUF1ik51F4YXdncq8/obTV8zkp5w8Cnqz iSS6Dw0JQwEtIKGY86AntNol9aYaI/WP0Jh80= Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:39:48 +0300 From: Alexey Dobriyan To: Grant Likely Cc: Christian Kujau , Stefan Lippers-Hollmann , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Michael Ellerman , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@infradead.org Subject: Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Message-ID: <20100614063948.GA3999@x200> References: <201006131722.44062.s.L-H@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt > the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue. It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq() From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexey Dobriyan Subject: Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:39:48 +0300 Message-ID: <20100614063948.GA3999@x200> References: <201006131722.44062.s.L-H@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=hWJxat9GfcR2qYrhO3vs/Cy8vc9Z7p4OL393nukN4xc=; b=xSdeujFheLljiBgu9kX10gNceR07aL1h+C5i8pB4tdOVENdITomEIfZOlU4OTrJ7UZ dn9EkUBTFemRKo2VVuJD9S8yJjjqdkPtaEPnLI3xg+vuiBDKyZhA7cjZUVjb7Ur1JxFh FtThjxZdRR0Nkai9LgIgCN8Wb4DK+ARz4g1D0= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Grant Likely Cc: Christian Kujau , Stefan Lippers-Hollmann , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Michael Ellerman , linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt > the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue. It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq()