From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tytso@mit.edu Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Avoid losing wakeup events during suspend Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:42:49 -0400 Message-ID: <20100621134249.GG6199__34454.1866252714$1277127862$gmane$org@thunk.org> References: <201006202350.27143.rjw@sisk.pl> <20100621061345.GF9735@gvim.org> <20100621121058.GF6199@thunk.org> <20100621132234.5eb880b0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100621132234.5eb880b0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Alan Cox Cc: mark gross <640e9920@gmail.com>, markgross@thegnar.org, Neil Brown , Dmitry Torokhov , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-pm mailing list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 01:22:34PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > You seem desperate to just throw it at Linus - you have been all along > before the discussion, during it and now: but I don't understand why ? Why are you so afraid to let Linus make the call? He's the benevolent dictator, isn't he? > It's as if you don't want progress to be made by other means ? It doesn't look like progress is being made here. - Ted