From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753019Ab0FWAN5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:13:57 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:39488 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751107Ab0FWANz (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:13:55 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [Bug #15863] 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:12:14 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.35-rc3-rjw+; KDE/4.4.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Miles Lane References: <201006222349.13096.rjw@sisk.pl> <20100622222547.GQ2290@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20100622222547.GQ2290@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006230212.14254.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, June 23, 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:49:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:34:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. > > > > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should > > > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > > > > We have been knocking these off as they appear. There is one or two > > > that the relevant maintainers have been ignoring, but that always seems > > > to be the case. ;-) > > > > > > Your choice as to whether you want to track the group... > > > > I think I'll simply leave that one bug open until all known instances have been > > dealt with. > > > > Please let me know when that happens. :-) > > So if I am sufficiently forgetful, I can just ask you to close the > bug immediately? > > Sorry, but you really couldn't expect me to pass up that kind of > loophole! ;-) OK, closed. Thanks, Rafael From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [Bug #15863] 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:12:14 +0200 Message-ID: <201006230212.14254.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <201006222349.13096.rjw@sisk.pl> <20100622222547.GQ2290@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100622222547.GQ2290-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" To: paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Miles Lane On Wednesday, June 23, 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:49:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:34:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. > > > > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should > > > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > > > > We have been knocking these off as they appear. There is one or two > > > that the relevant maintainers have been ignoring, but that always seems > > > to be the case. ;-) > > > > > > Your choice as to whether you want to track the group... > > > > I think I'll simply leave that one bug open until all known instances have been > > dealt with. > > > > Please let me know when that happens. :-) > > So if I am sufficiently forgetful, I can just ask you to close the > bug immediately? > > Sorry, but you really couldn't expect me to pass up that kind of > loophole! ;-) OK, closed. Thanks, Rafael