From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932191Ab0F3R6a (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:58:30 -0400
Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:21368 "EHLO
	rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755246Ab0F3R63 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>>);
	Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:58:29 -0400
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:56:37 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
       "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
       Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>, Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen
Message-ID: <20100630175637.GC16488@phenom.dumpdata.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006211456360.18470@kaball-desktop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006211456360.18470@kaball-desktop>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)
X-Source-IP: acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155]
X-Auth-Type: Internal IP
X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090207.4C2B85B5.01CA:SCFMA4539814,ss=1,fgs=0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 05:12:20PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Hi all,
> this is another update on the PV on HVM Xen series; a list of changes
> compared to the previous version follows:

Can you use the [v4] in the main patch (this is the fourth version of
these patches, right?)? I am getting confused as to which version I am
reviewing and if I've missed one or what not.

And in this first intro email state:

Since v7 the following things have changed:
 - Konrad made some comments.
 - etc.