From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.54.6]:56228 "HELO cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756380Ab0GIPNL convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:13:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 08:12:39 -0700 From: Jesse Barnes To: Linus Torvalds Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Maciej Rutecki , Andrew Morton , Kernel Testers List , Network Development , Linux ACPI , Linux PM List , Linux SCSI List , Linux Wireless List , DRI , Frederic Weisbecker , Al Viro , Shawn Starr , Dave Airlie , "David S. Miller" , Patrick McHardy , Jens Axboe , Enrico Bandiello , Norbert Preining Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Message-ID: <20100709081239.4eb8fddd@virtuousgeek.org> In-Reply-To: References: <-IGZ64uxA6G.A.P0H.bLmNMB@chimera> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 18:34:25 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 > > Subject         : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups > > Submitter       : Enrico Bandiello > > Date            : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) > > Message-ID      : <4C26317A.5070309@postal.uv.es> > > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 > > I don't think anybody noticed this one. Jesse? Oh I hadn't seen that... Enrico, can you bisect this issue? It could be some spurious hotplug events or possibly a stuck vblank interrupt... > > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 > > Subject         : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? > > Submitter       : Theodore Ts'o > > Date            : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c > > Message-ID      : > > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 > > Dave, Jesse? I haven't looked at the switchable graphics stuff, hopefully Dave has an idea here. > Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. > > > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 > > Subject         : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) > > Submitter       : Brian Bloniarz > > Date            : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) > > Handled-By      : Bjorn Helgaas > > This has a butt-ugly suggested patch that certainly won't be applied. > I saw the thread, but lost sight of it. Jesse, did that end up with > some resolution? I'll follow up with Yinghai, we were pretty clear about what we wanted from that patch. > > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > > Subject         : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > > Submitter       : Norbert Preining > > Date            : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > > Message-ID      : <20100606115534.GA9399@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> > > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 > > Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in > turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16252 > > which in turn then got closed. I dunno. Yeah, this is weird. Norbert, do you still see this? Have you tried to bisect it? -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 08:12:39 -0700 Message-ID: <20100709081239.4eb8fddd@virtuousgeek.org> References: <-IGZ64uxA6G.A.P0H.bLmNMB@chimera> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Maciej Rutecki , Andrew Morton , Kernel Testers List , Network Development , Linux ACPI , Linux PM List , Linux SCSI List , Linux Wireless List , DRI , Frederic Weisbecker , Al Viro , Shawn Starr , Dave Airlie , "David S. Miller" , Patrick McHardy , Jens Axboe , Enrico Bandiello , Norbert Preining List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 18:34:25 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Bug-Entry =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bu= g.cgi?id=3D16307 > > Subject =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, hi= gh number of wakeups > > Submitter =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : Enrico Bandiello > > Date =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: 2010-06-26 16:57 (1= 3 days old) > > Message-ID =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: <4C26317A.5070309-c0jvKHQHzSzx4jp4WZvp5g@public.gmane.org> > > References =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel= &m=3D127757403404259&w=3D2 =20 >=20 > I don't think anybody noticed this one. Jesse? Oh I hadn't seen that... Enrico, can you bisect this issue? It could be some spurious hotplug events or possibly a stuck vblank interrupt... > > Bug-Entry =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bu= g.cgi?id=3D16265 > > Subject =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : Why is kslowd accumulating so= much CPU time? > > Submitter =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : Theodore Ts'o > > Date =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: 2010-06-09 18:36 (3= 0 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad= 057b654d56972acf58c > > Message-ID =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: > > References =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel= &m=3D127610857819033&w=3D4 =20 >=20 > Dave, Jesse? I haven't looked at the switchable graphics stuff, hopefully Dave has an idea here. > Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. >=20 > > Bug-Entry =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bu= g.cgi?id=3D16228 > > Subject =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : BUG/boot failure on Dell Prec= ision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) > > Submitter =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : Brian Bloniarz > > Date =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: 2010-06-16 17:57 (2= 3 days old) > > Handled-By =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: Bjorn Helgaas =20 >=20 > This has a butt-ugly suggested patch that certainly won't be applied. > I saw the thread, but lost sight of it. Jesse, did that end up with > some resolution? I'll follow up with Yinghai, we were pretty clear about what we wanted from that patch. > > Bug-Entry =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bu= g.cgi?id=3D16179 > > Subject =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed o= n intel gfx? > > Submitter =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 : Norbert Preining > > Date =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: 2010-06-06 11:55 (3= 3 days old) > > Message-ID =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: <20100606115534.GA9399-DqSSrKF0TaxD4ZLkIoI8Yg@public.gmane.org= =2Etuwien.ac.at> > > References =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0: http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel= &m=3D127582534931581&w=3D2 =20 >=20 > Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in > turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: >=20 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D16252 >=20 > which in turn then got closed. I dunno. Yeah, this is weird. Norbert, do you still see this? Have you tried to bisect it? --=20 Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center