From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC] relaxed barrier semantics Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 01:34:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20100806233459.GB14751@lst.de> References: <20100728090025.GA9252@lst.de> <4C4FF592.9090800@kernel.org> <20100728092859.GA11096@lst.de> <20100802173930.GP16630@think> <4C5AB89C.5080700@vlnb.net> <20100805133225.GF29846@think> <4C5B1583.6070706@vlnb.net> <20100805195048.GA19030@lst.de> <4C5B19A0.9070200@vlnb.net> <4C5C22B8.9040109@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Vladislav Bolkhovitin , Christoph Hellwig , Chris Mason , Tejun Heo , Vivek Goyal , Jan Kara , jaxboe@fusionio.com, James.Bottomley@suse.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, swhiteho@redhat.com, konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp To: Hannes Reinecke Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C5C22B8.9040109@suse.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 04:56:56PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > But I can do bonnie runs in no time. > I have done some preliminary benchmarks by just enable ordered > queueing in sd.c and no other changes. Enabled what exactly?