From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Deegan Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] Nested Virtualization: CRn & paged real mode Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 13:40:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20100809124012.GZ13291@whitby.uk.xensource.com> References: <201008051702.16950.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201008051702.16950.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Christoph Egger Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > Allow paged real mode during vmrun emulation. > Emulate cr0 and cr4 when guest does not intercept them. I understand the paged-real-mode case, but why do you also allow CR0.CD and CR0.NW for nested VMs? Cheers, Tim. > diff -r 917f9eb07fc3 -r b1a356e5658d xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -1105,7 +1106,8 @@ int hvm_set_cr0(unsigned long value) > /* ET is reserved and should be always be 1. */ > value |= X86_CR0_ET; > > - if ( (value & (X86_CR0_PE | X86_CR0_PG)) == X86_CR0_PG ) > + if ( !nestedhvm_vmentry_emulate(v) && > + (value & (X86_CR0_PE | X86_CR0_PG)) == X86_CR0_PG ) > goto gpf; > > if ( (value & X86_CR0_PG) && !(old_value & X86_CR0_PG) ) > @@ -1159,7 +1161,7 @@ int hvm_set_cr0(unsigned long value) > } > } > > - if ( has_arch_mmios(v->domain) ) > + if ( !nestedhvm_vmentry_emulate(v) && has_arch_mmios(v->domain) ) > { > if ( (value & X86_CR0_CD) && !(value & X86_CR0_NW) ) > { Content-Description: ATT00001..txt > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel -- Tim Deegan Principal Software Engineer, XenServer Engineering Citrix Systems UK Ltd. (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)