From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o7JCiuqm171589 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 07:44:56 -0500 Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id DFC2E1E4C4B4 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 05:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (mailsrv1.zmi.at [212.69.164.54]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ha9hV9Oz40dGKela for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 05:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv.i.zmi.at (h081217106033.dyn.cm.kabsi.at [81.217.106.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailsrv2.i.zmi.at", Issuer "power4u.zmi.at" (not verified)) by mailsrv14.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69432701 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:45:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.localnet (saturn.i.zmi.at [10.72.27.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailsrv.i.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08DFB401C3A for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:45:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Monnerie Subject: Re: LWN.net article: creating 1 billion files -> XFS looses Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:45:22 +0200 References: <201008191312.49346@zmi.at> <20100819120512.GB9358@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20100819120512.GB9358@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201008191445.22568@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2249586217027161232==" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com --===============2249586217027161232== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4567438.0lh2FLJA9i"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart4567438.0lh2FLJA9i Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Donnerstag, 19. August 2010 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The creation and deletion performance is a known issue, and too a > large extent fixes by the new delaylog code. We're not quite as > fast as ext4 yet, but it's getting close. >=20 > The repair result looks a lot like the pre-3.1.0 xfsprogs repair. =20 Yes I know. I thought some XFS dev might contact the Author to do some=20 re-testing, as a reputation is quickly destroyed by such articles and=20 takes long to be returned. Just this week I had a friend in a FS=20 discussion saying "ins't XFS destroying/zeroing files on power=20 failure?". That information is ancient, but things like that stay in=20 peoples brain for(almost)ever. =2D-=20 mit freundlichen Gr=FCssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 ****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ****** http://www.it-podcast.at/aktuelle-sendung.html // Wir haben im Moment zwei H=E4user zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/ --nextPart4567438.0lh2FLJA9i Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkxtJ2IACgkQzhSR9xwSCbRPMACeJWWNXtfwlOOjKobwjYGf0jjh En0AniDOxAhKYoN693iSBTc6GGNO51lH =OU1R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4567438.0lh2FLJA9i-- --===============2249586217027161232== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs --===============2249586217027161232==--