All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Subject: [Updated changelog][PATCH 5/10] ACPI / PCI: Do not preserve _OSC control bits returned by a query (v4)
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:55:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201008232356.00066.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201008210154.41507.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Saturday, August 21, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> 
> There is the assumption in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() that it is
> always sufficient to compare the mask of _OSC control bits to be
> requested with the result of an _OSC query where all of the known
> control bits have been checked.  However, in general, that need not
> be the case.  For example, if an _OSC feature A depends on an _OSC
> feature B and control of A, B plus another _OSC feature C is
> requested simultaneously, the BIOS may return A, B, C, while it would
> only return C if A and C were requested without B.
> 
> That may result in passing a wrong mask of _OSC control bits to an
> _OSC control request, in which case the BIOS may only grant control
> of a subset of the requested features.  Moreover, acpi_pci_run_osc()
> will return error code if that happens and the caller of
> acpi_pci_osc_control_set() will not know that it's been granted
> control of some _OSC features.  Consequently, the system will
> generally not work as expected.
> 
> For this reason, make acpi_pci_osc_control_set() always check if
> control of the requested _OSC features will be granted before making
> the final control request.  As a result, the osc_control_qry and
> osc_queried members of struct acpi_pci_root are not necessary any
> more, so drop them and remove the remaining code referring to them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

I have a new version of the changelog due to a discovery I made while testing
the patchset, but the patch is not too big, so appended is the entire thing.

Thanks,
Rafael

---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: ACPI / PCI: Do not preserve _OSC control bits returned by a query (v4)

There is the assumption in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() that it is
always sufficient to compare the mask of _OSC control bits to be
requested with the result of an _OSC query where all of the known
control bits have been checked.  However, in general, that need not
be the case.  For example, if an _OSC feature A depends on an _OSC
feature B and control of A, B plus another _OSC feature C is
requested simultaneously, the BIOS may return A, B, C, while it would
only return C if A and C were requested without B.

That may result in passing a wrong mask of _OSC control bits to an
_OSC control request, in which case the BIOS may only grant control
of a subset of the requested features.  Moreover, acpi_pci_run_osc()
will return error code if that happens and the caller of
acpi_pci_osc_control_set() will not know that it's been granted
control of some _OSC features.  Consequently, the system will
generally not work as expected.

Apart from this acpi_pci_osc_control_set() always uses the mask
of _OSC control bits returned by the very first invocation of
acpi_pci_query_osc(), but that is done with the second argument
equal to OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT which generally happens
to affect the returned _OSC control bits.

For these reasons, make acpi_pci_osc_control_set() always check if
control of the requested _OSC features will be granted before making
the final control request.  As a result, the osc_control_qry and
osc_queried members of struct acpi_pci_root are not necessary any
more, so drop them and remove the remaining code referring to them.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
 drivers/acpi/pci_root.c |   20 +++++++-------------
 include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |    3 ---
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -249,12 +249,8 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_query_osc(st
 	status = acpi_pci_run_osc(root->device->handle, capbuf, &result);
 	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
 		root->osc_support_set = support;
-		if (control) {
+		if (control)
 			*control = result;
-		} else {
-			root->osc_control_qry = result;
-			root->osc_queried = 1;
-		}
 	}
 	return status;
 }
@@ -409,14 +405,12 @@ acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acp
 		goto out;
 
 	/* Need to query controls first before requesting them */
-	if (!root->osc_queried) {
-		status = acpi_pci_query_osc(root, root->osc_support_set, NULL);
-		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
-			goto out;
-	}
-	if ((root->osc_control_qry & control_req) != control_req) {
-		printk(KERN_DEBUG
-		       "Firmware did not grant requested _OSC control\n");
+	flags = control_req;
+	status = acpi_pci_query_osc(root, root->osc_support_set, &flags);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		goto out;
+
+	if (flags != control_req) {
 		status = AE_SUPPORT;
 		goto out;
 	}
Index: linux-2.6/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -377,9 +377,6 @@ struct acpi_pci_root {
 
 	u32 osc_support_set;	/* _OSC state of support bits */
 	u32 osc_control_set;	/* _OSC state of control bits */
-	u32 osc_control_qry;	/* the latest _OSC query result */
-
-	u32 osc_queried:1;	/* has _OSC control been queried? */
 };
 
 /* helper */

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-23 21:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-06  1:03 [PATCH 0/10] ACPI / PCI / PCIe: Rework _OSC handling (v3) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:05 ` [PATCH 1/10] ACPI / PCI: Introduce function for querying PCI root _OSC Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:06 ` [PATCH 2/10] PCI / PCIe/ AER: Introduce pci_aer_available() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:07 ` [PATCH 3/10] PCI / PCIe: Introduce commad line switch for disabling port services Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:08 ` [PATCH 4/10] PCI / PCIe: Ask BIOS for control of all native services at once (v6) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:09 ` [PATCH 5/10] PCI / PCIe: Disable PCIe port services during port initialization Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:10 ` [PATCH 6/10] PCI / PCIe: Remove the port driver module exit routine Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:11 ` [PATCH 7/10] PCI / Hot-plug: Query _OSC before requesting controls Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  2:20   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-06  2:20   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-06 10:34     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-09  1:22       ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-09  1:22       ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-06 10:34     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:12 ` [PATCH 8/10] ACPI / PCI: Do not preserve _OSC control bits returned by a query (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:13 ` [PATCH 9/10] ACPI / PCI: Reorder checks in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:15 ` [PATCH 10/10] ACPI / PCI: Merge acpi_pci_osc_control_{query|set}() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  3:25 ` [PATCH 0/10] ACPI / PCI / PCIe: Rework _OSC handling (v3) Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-06 10:42   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06 10:42   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  3:25 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-20 23:49 ` [PATCH 0/10] ACPI / PCI / PCIe: Rework _OSC handling (v4) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:50   ` [PATCH 1/10] PCI / PCIe/ AER: Introduce pci_aer_available() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:50   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-24 20:49     ` Jesse Barnes
2010-08-24 20:49     ` Jesse Barnes
2010-08-20 23:51   ` [PATCH 2/10] PCI / PCIe: Introduce commad line switch for disabling port services Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:51   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:52   ` [PATCH 3/10] ACPI / PCI: Reorder checks in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:52   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:53   ` [PATCH 4/10] ACPI / PCI: Make acpi_pci_query_osc() return control bits Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:53   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:54   ` [PATCH 5/10] ACPI / PCI: Do not preserve _OSC control bits returned by a query (v4) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:54   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-23 21:55     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-08-23 21:55     ` [Updated changelog][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:55   ` [PATCH 6/10] ACPI / PCI: Negotiate _OSC control bits before requesting them Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:55   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-23 21:53     ` [Update][PATCH 6/10] ACPI / PCI: Negotiate _OSC control bits before requesting them (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-23 21:53     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:56   ` [PATCH 7/10] PCI / PCIe: Ask BIOS for control of all native services at once (v7) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-21 20:02     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-21 20:02     ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:56   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:57   ` [PATCH 8/10] PCI / PCIe: Disable PCIe port services during port initialization Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:57   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:58   ` [PATCH 9/10] PCI / PCIe: Move PCIe PME code to the pcie directory Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:58   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:59   ` [PATCH 10/10] PCI / PCIe: Remove the port driver module exit routine Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:59   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:49 ` [PATCH 0/10] ACPI / PCI / PCIe: Rework _OSC handling (v4) Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201008232356.00066.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=mjg@redhat.com \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.