From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755501Ab0HXTwt (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:52:49 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:47590 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755366Ab0HXTwr (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:52:47 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=XD0D3BX69NoWjjqPiIUfN2gNiqTFlJTfOSh8/6MQDvRpUsLGQJZ4DSvjGAwBgzXJSO /xQ4ErX9gCdv6H9V0NblymK74K3v98JHr7kxCj645j6aIVDp+0STdwqNfAQRY17fTkPY OmrIyjo0a/SKYFcphFn/EI4j3XzhFhBf1DY28= Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:52:40 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Don Zickus Cc: Robert Richter , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Lin Ming , "fweisbec@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Huang, Ying" , Yinghai Lu , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3] perf, x86: try to handle unknown nmis with running perfctrs Message-ID: <20100824195240.GA5281@lenovo> References: <9g472epksbkxhgmw6a3qh8r5.1282316687153@email.android.com> <20100820152510.GA4167@elte.hu> <20100823085339.GA26713@elte.hu> <20100824171504.GI26154@erda.amd.com> <20100824172806.GF5723@lenovo> <20100824184658.GB4879@redhat.com> <20100824185458.GG5723@lenovo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100824185458.GG5723@lenovo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:54:58PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: ... > > > | commit 4a31bebe71ab2e4f6ecd6e5f9f2ac9f0ff38ff76 > > > | Author: Peter Zijlstra > > > | Date: Thu Aug 19 16:28:00 2010 +0200 > > > | > > > | perf, x86: Fix handle_irq return values > > > > Has anyone else seen kernel panics when enabling the LOCKUP_DETECTOR or > > apply Robert's patch? I keep getting a panic with unable to handle paging > > request everytime either Robert's patch or the lockup detector uses > > __get_cpu_var(). And only on 2.6.36 code. > > > > Cheers, > > Don > > > > I use 2.6.34 atm. Letme try 2.6.36 (which might require some time to recompile). > > -- Cyrill Don, for me it fails with somehow unrelated page handling fault - in reiserfs_evict_inode O_o Fails in __get_cpu_var I suspect might means a problem either in per-cpu allocator itself or we screw pointer somehow. Weird. -- Cyrill