From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752603Ab0HZSC5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:02:57 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:45800 "EHLO mail-ew0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752054Ab0HZSCz (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:02:55 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=k30l1hOpqwBO86iC+LHpiLU0IK6BR4E9/ozF4r/tg+10STcDYBIaJP6AgVqjD8eNmY O2F/B1DZF9JLFY2FAmeGWQSGzbHAzS8MlH7V5EBi9WCpq/ozrChOW60Mfv3hNqVYKkGI 5HCe3T38gqqWzrxSP/rfHdEYWsjAhhhlEzcTI= Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:02:50 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Don Zickus Cc: Robert Richter , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Lin Ming , "fweisbec@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Huang, Ying" , Yinghai Lu , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3] perf, x86: try to handle unknown nmis with running perfctrs Message-ID: <20100826180250.GB6306@lenovo> References: <20100820152510.GA4167@elte.hu> <20100825094819.GB3198@erda.amd.com> <20100825104130.GA27891@elte.hu> <20100825110006.GB27891@elte.hu> <20100825201106.GH4879@redhat.com> <20100826090008.GA22783@erda.amd.com> <20100826152246.GN4879@redhat.com> <20100826153404.GA6306@lenovo> <20100826164031.GO4879@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100826164031.GO4879@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:40:31PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 07:34:04PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > > > I'll keep looking for the race condition to better fix it. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Don > > > > > > > Sounds promising, mind to post new inter-diff? Ie what you have > > changed from Robert's patch. > > It was really in Peter's patch, just a stupid hack for now. > > Cheers, > Don > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c > index 4539b4b..9e65a7b 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c > @@ -777,7 +777,9 @@ again: > > done: > intel_pmu_enable_all(0); > - return handled; > + if (!handled) > + return handled; > + return ++handled; > } > > static struct event_constraint * > ok, it seems it just treat any unknown nmi as being came from PMU, no? -- Cyrill