From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o8659b0M155962 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 00:09:37 -0500 Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 479B2D90C8E for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (mailsrv1.zmi.at [212.69.164.54]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ZCoaazOkF5TWjeqV for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv.i.zmi.at (h081217106033.dyn.cm.kabsi.at [81.217.106.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailsrv2.i.zmi.at", Issuer "power4u.zmi.at" (not verified)) by mailsrv14.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63DEB12D for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 07:10:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.localnet (saturn.i.zmi.at [10.72.27.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailsrv.i.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 236DC401C2E for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 07:10:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Monnerie Subject: Re: XFS status update for August 2010 Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 07:10:10 +0200 References: <20100902145959.GA27887@infradead.org> <201009051137.07678@zmi.at> <4C845E71.20902@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <4C845E71.20902@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201009060710.14479@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3932805473262371767==" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com --===============3932805473262371767== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1485695.xbcyUirPmP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart1485695.xbcyUirPmP Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Montag, 6. September 2010 Eric Sandeen wrote: > People need to read up a little and know what they're tuning; > repeating this kind of suggestion leads to cargo-cultism for > performance "tuning" >=20 > IOW don't turn knobs just because they are there ... :) Other than most who write here I'm not a developer, but a sysadmin,=20 responsible for servers of all kind of ages, with XFS usage back to the=20 early 2.6 series. Default mount options use to change sometimes, and I=20 can't always check that after a system/kernel upgrade the default=20 options are satisfied or not. So specifying everything is safe, and=20 doesn't do any harm - right? And as it was Sunday morning, I wanted to help out Willy quickly,=20 without looking specifically which options he would need. I was sure=20 some of you who know it would guide him later, but maybe only on Monday,=20 so I took that quick path to find a solution. =2D-=20 mit freundlichen Gr=FCssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 ****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ****** http://www.it-podcast.at/aktuelle-sendung.html // Wir haben im Moment zwei H=E4user zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/ --nextPart1485695.xbcyUirPmP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkyEd7YACgkQzhSR9xwSCbSmPwCgorWW4gGbiP+Ktm8bdcKRu9aF u9sAnjDx3B9CnrKZrLlL47HycWW+jlG2 =bWLM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1485695.xbcyUirPmP-- --===============3932805473262371767== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs --===============3932805473262371767==--