From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o86NVC5E206879 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 18:31:12 -0500 Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 63ABAD91637 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 16:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (mailsrv1.zmi.at [212.69.164.54]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id kFBJeHB2HJ0El6IX for ; Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv.i.zmi.at (h081217106033.dyn.cm.kabsi.at [81.217.106.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailsrv2.i.zmi.at", Issuer "power4u.zmi.at" (not verified)) by mailsrv14.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EEC817C for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 01:31:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.localnet (saturn.i.zmi.at [10.72.27.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailsrv.i.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41DF9401C2E for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 01:31:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Monnerie Subject: Re: xfs mount/create options (was: XFS status update for August 2010) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 01:31:49 +0200 References: <4C857152.4060904@sauce.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <4C857152.4060904@sauce.co.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201009070131.49759@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1765158231152777363==" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com --===============1765158231152777363== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1949719.AnnigDAlMv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart1949719.AnnigDAlMv Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Dienstag, 7. September 2010 Richard Scobie wrote: > > When I defined su/sw on mkfs, is it enough, or would I always have > > to specify sunit/swidth with every mount too? >=20 > Yes. sunit/swidth only needs to be added to your fstab if you either > got the calculation wrong when you initially created the fs and > wish to correct it, or if you grow the fs later over more drives. Thank you. =20 > Note that with recent kernels, mkfs.xfs will choose the optimal=20 > sunit/swidth for you if you are using md RAID or LVM (I believe the=20 > latter is correct). I don't use software RAID, but thanks for clarification. =2D-=20 mit freundlichen Gr=FCssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 ****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ****** http://www.it-podcast.at/aktuelle-sendung.html // Wir haben im Moment zwei H=E4user zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/ --nextPart1949719.AnnigDAlMv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkyFeeUACgkQzhSR9xwSCbTgewCdHvpKaE5eWW7X3Av8Xjvzb9L3 AwgAniqEVRSpBVUVqxrU7FWq6pruU5O3 =CPtp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1949719.AnnigDAlMv-- --===============1765158231152777363== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs --===============1765158231152777363==--