From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757783Ab0IGP3C (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:29:02 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:37723 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757629Ab0IGP2x (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:28:53 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=rkaleBoXm8f585A1s0dg8jbFP88krIS+UJI7a4pmNH9xIwPP3g2a8v+4SNdF7wyI7W Lq+Xwdv3NqvHh4WHKuptnKzK1ZtnSsbVUGVJePVhmeA6AlDnQv4SbBF8FYdRMhUrZ8KA 47ds+Pks7VTwqiHFlORbWvNwkZRdrmf2+bEs0= Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 00:28:40 +0900 From: Minchan Kim To: Mel Gorman Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel List , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , Wu Fengguang , Andrea Arcangeli , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , KOSAKI Motohiro , Dave Chinner , Chris Mason , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] vmscan: Synchrounous lumpy reclaim use lock_page() instead trylock_page() Message-ID: <20100907152840.GD4620@barrios-desktop> References: <1283770053-18833-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <1283770053-18833-6-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1283770053-18833-6-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:47:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > From: KOSAKI Motohiro > > With synchrounous lumpy reclaim, there is no reason to give up to reclaim > pages even if page is locked. This patch uses lock_page() instead of > trylock_page() in this case. > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Minchan Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] vmscan: Synchrounous lumpy reclaim use lock_page() instead trylock_page() Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 00:28:40 +0900 Message-ID: <20100907152840.GD4620@barrios-desktop> References: <1283770053-18833-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <1283770053-18833-6-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel List , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , Wu Fengguang , Andrea Arcangeli , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , KOSAKI Motohiro , Dave Chinner , Chris Mason , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton To: Mel Gorman Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1283770053-18833-6-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:47:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > From: KOSAKI Motohiro > > With synchrounous lumpy reclaim, there is no reason to give up to reclaim > pages even if page is locked. This patch uses lock_page() instead of > trylock_page() in this case. > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org