From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754039Ab0IKRLt (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:11:49 -0400 Received: from ist.d-labs.de ([213.239.218.44]:36048 "EHLO mx01.d-labs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753810Ab0IKRLs (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:11:48 -0400 Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:11:46 +0200 From: Florian Mickler To: Jan III Sobieski Cc: LKML Subject: Re: 2458 days of Linux development - some stats and thoughts Message-ID: <20100911191146.7d38eba9@schatten.dmk.lab> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6cvs31 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 00:04:18 +0200 Jan III Sobieski wrote: > I added regressions stats - total number of regressions for each > kernel and number of regressions not fixed yet. It is interesting that > the number of not fixed regressions is really low. > What should I do with these numbers, when I don't know how they are created? What do they signify? What is their relevance? What uncertainty is connected to these numbers? What follows? Why are they created? How are they related? Cheers, Flo