All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [RFC]pagealloc: compensate a task for direct page reclaim
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:52:39 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100917145224.3BDB.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284636396.1726.5.camel@shli-laptop>

> A task enters into direct page reclaim, free some memory. But sometimes
> the task can't get a free page after direct page reclaim because
> other tasks take them (this is quite common in a multi-task workload
> in my test). This behavior will bring extra latency to the task and is
> unfair. Since the task already gets penalty, we'd better give it a compensation.
> If a task frees some pages from direct page reclaim, we cache one freed page,
> and the task will get it soon. We only consider order 0 allocation, because
> it's hard to cache order > 0 page.
> 
> Below is a trace output when a task frees some pages in try_to_free_pages(), but
> get_page_from_freelist() can't get a page in direct page reclaim.
> 
> <...>-809   [004]   730.218991: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 809, comm mmap_test
> <...>-806   [001]   730.237969: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 806, comm mmap_test
> <...>-810   [005]   730.237971: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 810, comm mmap_test
> <...>-809   [004]   730.237972: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 809, comm mmap_test
> <...>-811   [006]   730.241409: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 811, comm mmap_test
> <...>-809   [004]   730.241412: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 809, comm mmap_test
> <...>-812   [007]   730.241435: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 812, comm mmap_test
> <...>-809   [004]   730.245036: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 809, comm mmap_test
> <...>-809   [004]   730.260360: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 809, comm mmap_test
> <...>-805   [000]   730.260362: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 805, comm mmap_test
> <...>-811   [006]   730.263877: __alloc_pages_nodemask: progress 147, order 0, pid 811, comm mmap_test

As far as I remembered, two years ago, similar patches was posted. but 
minchan found it makes performance regression when kernbench run.

http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20080905.101958.0f84e87d.ja.html



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-17  5:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-16 11:26 [RFC]pagealloc: compensate a task for direct page reclaim Shaohua Li
2010-09-16 15:00 ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-17  2:34   ` Shaohua Li
2010-09-17  4:47     ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-20  8:50   ` Mel Gorman
2010-09-17  5:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100917145224.3BDB.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.