From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1760600Ab0I1CwL (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:52:11 -0400
Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:49348 "EHLO
	cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757964Ab0I1CwK (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:52:10 -0400
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:52:02 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Keng-Y=FC?= Lin <keng-yu.lin@canonical.com>
Cc: len.brown@intel.com, alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk, superm1@ubuntu.com,
        platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dell-laptop: Add debugfs support
Message-ID: <20100928025202.GA17740@srcf.ucam.org>
References: <1284702459-31646-1-git-send-email-keng-yu.lin@canonical.com> <1285325323-4528-1-git-send-email-keng-yu.lin@canonical.com> <20100927140028.GB856@srcf.ucam.org> <AANLkTi=buauo9M=nLnZhEXm-do=Vt1mPwhq3oPFH9fQ_@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=buauo9M=nLnZhEXm-do=Vt1mPwhq3oPFH9fQ_@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:43:44AM +0800, Keng-Yü Lin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> > What's the difference between this version and v3?
> >
> > --
> > Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
> >
> 
> Hi Mathew:
>   V3 does not print the correct bit of hwswitch_state. I just found
> that V4 messed up by the operator precedence; will send a new fix.

Ok, no problem. In future it's helpful to include a changelog with the 
difference - see Documentation/SubmittingPatches section 15 for some 
information on that. I'll wait for v5 and then merge it.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org