From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754240Ab0JWLWG (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2010 07:22:06 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:55141 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752606Ab0JWLWF (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2010 07:22:05 -0400 Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 13:21:59 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Philipp Reisner Cc: Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] convert DRBD to REQ_FLUSH/FUA Message-ID: <20101023112159.GA23540@lst.de> References: <1281977523-19335-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <201008241745.35242.philipp.reisner@linbit.com> <20101022083511.GA7853@lst.de> <201010231318.33517.philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201010231318.33517.philipp.reisner@linbit.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: 0 () Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 01:18:33PM +0200, Philipp Reisner wrote: > Hi Jens, > > Christoph Hellwig pointed out that drbd is the only driver > that still uses/supports barriers instead of FUE in linux-next. > > I revitalized three patches that remove the barrier bits from DRBD... This looks good. You probably don't actually need the MD_NO_FUA flag - REQ_FUA writes will always work - they just ignored by drivers not implementing cache control.