From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Miros=B3aw?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Ethtool: cleanup strategy Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:30:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20101031043021.GA10462@rere.qmqm.pl> References: <20101030.211820.229761955.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from rere.qmqm.pl ([89.167.52.164]:49074 "EHLO rere.qmqm.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751394Ab0JaEaW (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:30:22 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101030.211820.229761955.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:18:20PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > Can you do me a huge favor? >=20 > In the future make the dates more sensible in your patch postings. >=20 > With how you did this, your patches are scattered all over the place > in patchwork because it orders things by date, have a look: >=20 > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/ Thanks for the hint. I used git format-patch and it creates Date headers based on git commit time. I'll probably just filter them or git rebase before sending patches from now on. Best Regards, Micha=B3 Miros=B3aw