From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752480Ab0KIQZB (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:25:01 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38575 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751223Ab0KIQZA (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:25:00 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:18:27 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Alan Stern , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Prasad , Roland McGrath , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Q: perf_event && event->owner Message-ID: <20101109161827.GB1903@redhat.com> References: <20101108145647.GA3426@redhat.com> <20101108145754.GB3434@redhat.com> <20101108201108.GA6777@nowhere> <1289248872.2191.27.camel@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1289248872.2191.27.camel@laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/08, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > As to removing event->owner as Oleg suggests, its a published ABI and > there might be people using it. This was my main question. It's a pity ;) This ABI doesn't look very nice, but OK. Oleg.