All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>, Bodo Eggert <7eggert@web.de>,
	Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@google.com>,
	"Figo.zhang" <figo1802@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:19:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101114181905.bc5b44f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101115093410.BEFD.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 09:54:14 +0900 (JST) KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> > 2010/11/13 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>:
> > >
> > > Please apply this. this patch revert commits of oom changes since v2.6.35.
> > 
> > I'm not getting involved in this whole flame-war. You need to convince
> > Andrew, who has been the person everything went through.
> 
> I wonder why he deep silence.

Nothing to say, really.  Seems each time we're told about a bug or a
regression, David either fixes the bug or points out why it wasn't a
bug or why it wasn't a regression or how it was a deliberate behaviour
change for the better.

I just haven't seen any solid reason to be concerned about the state of
the current oom-killer, sorry.

I'm concerned that you're concerned!  A lot.  When someone such as
yourself is unhappy with part of MM then I sit up and pay attention. 
But after all this time I simply don't understand the technical issues
which you're seeing here.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-15  2:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-14  5:07 [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-14 19:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-15  0:54   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-15  2:19     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
     [not found]       ` <AANLkTik_SDaiu2eQsJ9+4ywLR5K5V1Od-hwop6gwas3F@mail.gmail.com>
2010-11-15  4:41         ` Figo.zhang
2010-11-15  4:41           ` Figo.zhang
2010-11-15  6:57       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-15 10:34         ` David Rientjes
2010-11-15 23:31           ` Jesper Juhl
2010-11-16  0:06             ` David Rientjes
2010-11-16 10:04               ` Martin Knoblauch
2010-11-16 10:33                 ` Alessandro Suardi
2010-11-16  0:13             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-11-16  6:43               ` David Rientjes
2010-11-16 11:03               ` Alan Cox
2010-11-16 13:03                 ` Florian Mickler
2010-11-16 14:55                   ` Alan Cox
2010-11-16 20:57                     ` David Rientjes
2010-11-16 21:01                       ` Fabio Comolli
2010-11-17  4:04                     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-11-16 15:15               ` Alejandro Riveira Fernández
2010-11-23  7:16           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-28  1:45             ` David Rientjes
2010-11-30 13:04               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-30 20:02                 ` David Rientjes
2010-11-23  7:16         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-23 23:51   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-14 21:58 ` David Rientjes
2010-11-15 23:33   ` Bodo Eggert
2010-11-15 23:50     ` David Rientjes
2010-11-17  0:06       ` Bodo Eggert
2010-11-17  0:25         ` David Rientjes
2010-11-17  0:48         ` Mandeep Singh Baines
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-10 15:14 [PATCH v3]mm/oom-kill: direct hardware access processes should get bonus Figo.zhang
2010-11-10 15:24 ` Figo.zhang
2010-11-14  5:21   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-14 21:33     ` David Rientjes
2010-11-15  3:26       ` [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series Figo.zhang
2010-11-15  3:26         ` Figo.zhang
2010-11-15 10:14         ` David Rientjes
2010-11-15 10:14           ` David Rientjes
2010-11-15 10:57           ` Alan Cox
2010-11-15 10:57             ` Alan Cox
2010-11-15 20:54             ` David Rientjes
2010-11-15 20:54               ` David Rientjes
2010-11-23  7:16             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-23  7:16               ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101114181905.bc5b44f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=7eggert@web.de \
    --cc=figo1802@gmail.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=msb@google.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.