From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Re: XEN boot hangs at ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0]
	(0000:00)
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:49:30 -0500
Message-ID: <20101115164930.GG345@dumpdata.com>
References: <000001cb7530$d9a39ed0$8ceadc70$@de>
	<20101111161807.GA29365@dumpdata.com>
	<1289495795203-3260687.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<20101112221953.GB26189@dumpdata.com>
	<1289643274711-3263418.post@n5.nabble.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1289643274711-3263418.post@n5.nabble.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Neobiker <neo1106@neobiker.de>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

> I know about the pci passthrough (of course), but my usb ports are all
> onboard and i have to connect the usb ports to different domains. So if i
> connect the usb controller to vdr domu, i possibly will miss the other usb
> ports for other domains... so pvusb works perfectly for my
> usb-to-multi-domain scenario.

Ok.
> 
> Are you interested in investigating the failure on the "old" kernel with
> another debug log?

Not really.. which is why I was hinting for you to try the PVOPS and PCI pass-through.

> I personally think it would be better to concentrate all developper
> capacitys in finishing the migration to the new pvops kernels and to
> complete all missing features ...  ;-) 
> 
> Btw: Congratlations for the work done untill now !!

Thank you.
> 
> Xen may be back to stay as a virtualisation standard if kernel 2.6.38 will
> be able to start as dom0 (as 2.6.37 will) and to be able to drive domUs
> (missing in upcoming 2.6.37). I think that's really really (!) important for
> XEN future. And: XEN 4.0.x must be as rock stable as 3.4.2 as soon as
> possible... i personnally don't think about using 4.0.x for production
> systems at this point...

Uh, even 4.0.1? What are the issues you are worried about?