From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Schillstrom Subject: Re: [*v4 PATCH 0/3] IPVS: Backup Adding Ipv6 and Persistence support Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:22:35 +0100 Message-ID: <201011160822.35551.hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com> References: <201011151931.26789.hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com> <20101116064436.GA19642@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20101116064436.GA19642@verge.net.au> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: lvs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Simon Horman Cc: Julian Anastasov , LVS-Devel , Daniel Lezcano On Tuesday 16 November 2010 07:44:39 Simon Horman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 07:31:26PM +0100, Hans Schillstrom wrote: > > This patch series adds/(updates) the following functionality > > in the synchronization between master and backup daemons. > > > > - IPv6 > > - Persistence Engine > > - Firewall marks transferred > > - Time-outs transferred. > > - Flag field increased to 32 bits. > > > > Note: > > It depends on Patch 1-9 in staging branch. > > "IPVS: Backup, Prepare for transferring firewall marks (fwmark) to the backup daemon." > > to ... > > "IPVS: skb defrag in L7 helpers" > > Hi Hans, > > unfortuantely I am a bit confused about which tree your patches apply to. I was your staging branch, as you suggested. > > I have sent a pull request to Patrick just now and as part of that > I have updated the master, for-patrick, and stable branches such > that they are currently all the same thing. This means stable has > been purged and then re-added. In the process I dropped the following > patches: > > * IPVS: ip_vs_pe.c, use strncmp to be safe. > > Julian didn't seem very happy with this change. > He suggested using pe->name_len to be safe. > > * IPVS: Prepare for transferring firewall marks (fwmark) to the backup daemon. > > I believe you have revised this idea > > * IPVS: Backup, Adding structs for new sync format > > I believe this one has changed too. > > I notice that Julian made some comments too. When you are ready could you > please post a fresh patch series, that includes all required patches and > applies cleanly on top of the master branch of lvs-next-2.6? I will send new fresh ones today for all that I need -- Regards Hans Schillstrom