From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932326Ab0KPUL1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:11:27 -0500 Received: from cpoproxy2-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.39.38]:49944 "HELO cpoproxy2-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932248Ab0KPUL0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:11:26 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=kQIS5dLyN62z/yGKwPkA69tByeh8ZEM6op2UacHObIkw0VX/QKKEBHI4w9UK7l2w3ufMx4HbjQPwlEuLojzTiFH3ixmGGg5mYCOmkgVoKmcE3nWQTM070OBb5ISXnjCW; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:11:07 -0800 From: Jesse Barnes To: Florian Mickler Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Dave Airlie , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Keith Packard Subject: Re: "do_IRQ: 0.89 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)" Message-ID: <20101116121107.7728e971@jbarnes-desktop> In-Reply-To: <20101116204645.2c105e9b@schatten.dmk.lab> References: <20101011154826.440b4990@jbarnes-desktop> <20101011164014.5a11ee48@jbarnes-desktop> <201010122101.17812.rjw@sisk.pl> <20101012124938.47170457@jbarnes-desktop> <20101116204645.2c105e9b@schatten.dmk.lab> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 67.174.193.198 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:46:45 +0100 Florian Mickler wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:49:38 -0700 > Jesse Barnes wrote: > > I don't think I buy that VGA is special anyway, at least not for KMS > > enabled kernels, where vgacon and the BIOS can't assume anything about > > graphics state anymore. More generally, I don't think BIOSes have been > > able to assume anything about the current graphics state since Windows > > 3.1, when most platforms stopped using BIOS calls and/or VGA regs for > > mode setting. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > does this need to go to 2.6.36.y? (is it already on it's way?) > > commit 97c145f7c87453cec90e91238fba5fe2c1561b32 > Author: Jesse Barnes > Date: Fri Nov 5 15:16:36 2010 -0400 > > PCI: read current power state at enable time I hadn't planned on pushing this to stable, but if you have a need for it there, feel free to propose it. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center