From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.27]:2813 "EHLO smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755170Ab0KPVmf (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:42:35 -0500 From: Hans Verkuil To: David Ellingsworth Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] V4L BKL removal: first round Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:42:02 +0100 Cc: Andy Walls , Arnd Bergmann , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Laurent Pinchart References: <201011162210.18000.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011162242.02446.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> List-ID: Sender: On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 22:32:57 David Ellingsworth wrote: > Hans, > > I've had some patches pending for a while now that affect the dsbr100 > driver. The patches can be seen here: > http://desource.dyndns.org/~atog/gitweb/?p=linux-media.git in the > dsbr100 branch. The first patch in the series fixes locking issues > throughout the driver and converts it to use the unlocked ioctl. The > series is a bit old, so it doesn't make use of the v4l2 core assisted > locking; but that is trivial to implement after this patch. Would it be a problem for you if for 2.6.37 I just replace .ioctl by .unlocked_ioctl? And do the full conversion for 2.6.38? That way the 2.6.37 patches remain small. Regards. Hans -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by Cisco