From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfgang Denk Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:11:32 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [STATUS] Custodian changes, using Patchwork In-Reply-To: <201011181346.23452.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20101112102231.5F71E1522C0@gemini.denx.de> <201011180441.47800.vapier@gentoo.org> <20101118124601.D166114EA7E@gemini.denx.de> <201011181346.23452.vapier@gentoo.org> Message-ID: <20101118191132.9D8E914E647@gemini.denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Mike Frysinger, In message <201011181346.23452.vapier@gentoo.org> you wrote: > > > You (as a custodian) can "delegate" patches to a specific maintainer. > > I. e. you would not mark them as "net", but delegate them to the > > network custodian. > > right, but atm that is you, so there isnt much of a way to differentiate > between the massive common patches that go to you and just network ones That's true. BUt it's still better if the patch is explicitly on my todo list than it's being left unassigned. As soon as a new net custodian volunteers I can still re-delgate everything he is willing to swallow. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de There are two ways to write error-free programs. Only the third one works.