From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 02:13:06 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCHWORK] 71715 -> Not applicable. In-Reply-To: <4CE61253.8070709@free.fr> References: <4CE59B4E.90804@free.fr> <201011181813.22996.vapier@gentoo.org> <4CE61253.8070709@free.fr> Message-ID: <201011190213.07089.vapier@gentoo.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Friday, November 19, 2010 00:59:47 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 19/11/2010 00:13, Mike Frysinger a ?crit : > > On Thursday, November 18, 2010 17:21:49 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > >> Besides, about half the archs do not use asm-generic/unaligned, and half > >> do > > > > that's because half the arches implemented unaligned.h whilst only > > thinking of themselves. the other half benefited from my work of > > thinking of everyone. > > > >> a resubmit on the list will be the occasion > > > > i dont use/care about arm. i wrote the patch because i wanted to be > > nice. if you cant be bothered to clean up arm cruft, then feel free to > > mark the patch as "pending due to maintainer laziness". > > > >> for example, to discuss whether all arches should use it. > > > > all arches should use it. whether the maintainers can be bothered to fix > > their headers is a different question. > > My question was about the technical merits of the patch: why should all > arches use it? What does it improve at a performance, maintenability, or > other technical level ? obviously maintenance is improved since only one header needs to be maintained and it isnt an arm one -mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20101119/9c6b683a/attachment.pgp