From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 1-1-12-13a.han.sth.bostream.se ([82.182.30.168]:43393 "EHLO palpatine.hardeman.nu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753190Ab0KSXzp (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 18:55:45 -0500 Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 00:55:42 +0100 From: David =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E4rdeman?= To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Jarod Wilson , Jarod Wilson , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Apple remote support Message-ID: <20101119235542.GA4694@hardeman.nu> References: <20101104193823.GA9107@hardeman.nu> <4CD30CE5.5030003@redhat.com> <4CE2743D.5040501@redhat.com> <20101116232636.GA28261@hardeman.nu> <20101118163304.GB16899@redhat.com> <20101118204319.GA8213@hardeman.nu> <20101118204952.GC16899@redhat.com> <4CE593BF.4010908@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4CE593BF.4010908@redhat.com> List-ID: Sender: Mauro Carvalho Chehab On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:59:43PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >Em 18-11-2010 18:49, Jarod Wilson escreveu: >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:43:19PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:33:04AM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote: >>>> Mauro's suggestion, iirc, was that max scancode size should be a >>>> property of the keytable uploaded, and something set at load time (and >>>> probably exposed as a sysfs node, similar to protocols). >>> >>> I think that would be a step in the wrong direction. It would make the >>> keytables less flexible while providing no real advantages. > >We can't simply just change NEC to 32 bits, as we'll break userspace ABI >(as current NEC keycode tables use only 16 bits). So, an old table will not >worky anymore, if we do such change. The idea was to do the conversion from to 32 bits in get/setkeycode. -- David Härdeman