From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:59636 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755531Ab0KUUd2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:33:28 -0500 Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 20:31:24 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Greg KH , "Ted Ts'o" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless , David Miller , "John W. Linville" , Stephen Hemminger , "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" , Charles Marker , Jouni Malinen , Kevin Hayes , Zhifeng Cai , Don Breslin , Doug Dahlby , Julia Lawall Subject: Re: Challenges with doing hardware bring up with Linux first Message-ID: <20101121203124.1ba8212e@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <20101121130236.GE23423@thunk.org> <20101121172906.GD3703@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Right -- which is why ideally I think it'd be nice to have an open > permissive stack people shared. My preference would be to just pick up Which we know in practice they won't. They'll sit on fixes (often security fixes) and tweak and add private copies of features. In turn the Linux one could then only keep up by adding features itself - which would have to be GPL to stop the same abuse continuing. It's a nice idea but the corporations exist to make money and adding proprietary custom stack add-ons is clearly a good move on their part to do that. Alan